Daniel Defoe 
Reasons Against the Succession of the House of Hanover 
With an Enquiry How Far the Abdication of King James, Supposing It to Be Legal, Ought to Affect the Person of the Pretender

In ‘Reasons Against the Succession of the House of Hanover, ‘ Daniel Defoe presents a thought-provoking examination of the Hanoverian succession and its implications. Through well-reasoned arguments and historical context, Defoe explores the complexities of King James’s abdication and the legitimacy of the Pretender’s claim to the throne. This thoughtful inquiry delves into the political and constitutional aspects of the time, making it a significant work in understanding the dynamics of British monarchy and governance during that period.