Daniel Defoe 
Reasons Against the Succession of the House of Hanover 
With an Enquiry How Far the Abdication of King James, Supposing It to Be Legal, Ought to Affect the Person of the Pretender

Daniel Defoe’s ‘Reasons Against the Succession of the House of Hanover’ is a treatise that presents a detailed argument against the succession of the House of Hanover to the British throne. Written in Defoe’s characteristic direct and persuasive style, the book delves into the historical context and implications of such a succession, making a compelling case for alternative paths for the monarchy. Defoe’s use of logic and factual evidence shines through in his meticulous analysis of the political landscape of his time. The book is a powerful piece of political writing that sheds light on the complexities of succession and monarchy in the early 18th century. Daniel Defoe’s background as a prolific writer and political commentator undoubtedly influenced his decision to pen this thought-provoking treatise. His keen observation of society and politics, combined with his ability to articulate complex ideas, makes ‘Reasons Against the Succession of the House of Hanover’ a must-read for those interested in political history and the dynamics of power. Defoe’s persuasive arguments and historical insights make this book a valuable addition to any reader’s collection.